This blog was used by HCCA until 2018 when we transitioned to a new website. This blog is no longer active.
You can find out more about us at www.hcca.org.au
This is an interesting resource, written
by a Registered Nurse turned health advocate, who has also worked as a
complaints officer at the Office of the Health Care Complaints Commission. The
book does not shy away from looking at issues, risks and problems you run
across as a health consumer.
Some of the
language I think is a little simplistic, and one section goes as far to say
that if you treat your health team poorly it is your own fault if they treat
you badly and your health suffers as a consequence. I found this a bit
concerning. For the most part I think the book is full of really useful
checklists, examples and ideas about how to keep yourself safe in the health
care system. Well worth a read. I really liked the section about writing a
medical history to take to appointments or hospital admissions that you can
update. We have a copy of the book here
in the office should you be interested.
HCCA has been very involved with this project. Our involvement dates back to 2010 when we first proposed a sub-acute hospital to the then Minister for Health, Katy Gallagher.
Since that time we have undertaken plenty of research, reading articles, attending conferences, talking to consumers about their experience, and visiting similar facilities in other places. All of this informs the positions we take when we advocate for design of the building - including car parks - as well as the way care will be delivered.
Yelin Hung, Darlene Cox and Nick Wales at the site of UCPH.
Consumer representatives have participated in User Groups to date. These are groups that bring together consumers and clinicians to consider planning issues. User groups have been focussed on many aspects of the design, including the main foyer, hydrotherapy, pharmacy, equipment loans, medical imaging inpatient rooms, rehabilitation day services and pathology.
An important aspect of the event was a smoking ceremony, to cleanse and refresh the land before construction begins.
Duncan Smoth from Wiradjuri Echoes conducting the smoking ceremony
Minister for Health, Simon Corbell
Following the smoking ceremony, both Andrew Barr MLA, the Chief Minster and Simon Corbell MLA, the Minister of Health spoke, outlining the role the University of Canberra Public Hospital will play in helping improve access to health services for the ACT. The Chief Minister also stated that health is the Government's number one priority.
Finally to mark the official start to construction of the University of Canberra Public Hospital Andrew Barr MLA, Simon Corbell MLA, Meegan Fitzharris MLA, Chris Bourke MLA and Vice Chancellor Professor Stephen Parker turned the first sod on the site. And yes, there were a few jokes about how many Minsiters and Vice Chancellors it takes to turn a sod.
Handshakes all round for the sod turning.
Work is expected to start in the coming weeks, with the fence up around the site on the corner of Aikman and Ginninderra Drives in Bruce. The site is clearly marked with a banner on the whole external fence.
Work is also continuing on the Final Sketch Plan for the hospital with great involvement from consumer representatives. Last week the consumer representatives that will be involved in the User Groups came along to and induction to have a look at the current plans and what will be involved in the User Groups. It’s fantastic to have so much involvement from our members to help improve the design.
The current date for completion and opening of University of Canberra Public Hospital will is early 2018.
There is more information online, including this video.
The
Minister for Health, Sussan Ley, gave some introductory comments about why
the MBS needs to be reviewed and why consumer and carer input is critical to
that process.
Professor Bruce Robinson, Chair of the Review
Taskforce, then gave an overview of the Review, key issues in the Consultation
Paper which is providing the basis for their call for public submissions.
Professor Robinson also provided an update on
progress with the Review. Its first report to Government is due in December
2015.
MBS review activities have been distributed
among several groups including Clinical Committees, a Principles and Rules
committee and Item-specific working groups.
Of the 30 Clinical Committees, 6 priority
areas were launched in October – Obstetrics, ENT, Gastroenterology, Thoracic
Surgery, Pathology and Diagnostic Imaging.
The input received so far draws on a wide
variety of experiences with the MBS:
250
people have submitted feedback online, representing all states and territories.
126
clinicians or health professional organisations, 96 consumers or carers, 20
others.
Carried
out a triage of items,
Created
a preliminary list of obsolete items is being examined further,
Targeted
areas are being moved into evaluation (eg sleep studies, pre-natal testing)
and,
Several
new items have been proposed.
Referral
regulation: Consumers and clinicians have asked to re-evaluate the three month
limit on specialist to specialist referrals. This limit can force clinically
unnecessary ‘renewal’ consultations.
Rural
Delivery: As rural delivery models and workforce levels evolve, stakeholders
have asked for updates to geographic adjustments such as exemptions and cost
adjustments.
Ongoing
item reviews: Stakeholders suggest that more frequent ongoing reviews could
make the MBS a ‘living document’ improving the quality and relevance of
procedures for patients.
The Review has already;
The Rules Committee is considering cross-cutting
issues whose implications extend across the Clinical Committees including but
not limited to;
Finally, there was some focused discussion
around the key themes of the inquiry – unnecessary medical consultations,
procedures or tests; application of Medicare rules; information requirements to
make decisions about services; and how consumers could be engaged in the review
process.
The final discussion explored how consumers
and carers could be better engaged in the Review process. The Review Taskforce have
suggested consumers be involved as members of Clinical Committees, through
public consultation on draft recommendations and through health consumer
organisations. However they don’t have a clear consumer engagement strategy at this
stage. Participants discussed other options such as social media and pointed
out the importance of meaningful engagement with Aboriginal and/or Torres
Strait Islander communities, Culturally and Linguistically Diverse communities,
and refugee and migrant communities.
The MBS Review website contains all relevant
information about the program, including outcomes of the consumer and
stakeholder forums:
In mid August I was
lucky enough to attend the first day of the 9th National LGBTI
Health Conference Health in Difference (and I apologise for the delay in reporting back!). The most
striking thing about the conference was how thoughtfully the program and
speakers engaged with the overlaps and interactions between healthcare
provision and marginalisation of groups. A special focus was placed on how
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and culturally and linguistically diverse
LGBTI peoples face multiple disadvantages, both when seeking healthcare and
more broadly.
The conference
speakers shared stories that showed how far we’ve come in LGBTI communities,
but also how much work remains – a lesbian mother who in the 1990s snuck into
hospital to care for her baby (it took the hospital a week to notice there were
two mums taking turns), Bob Brown’s memories of shock therapy and seeking out
so many psychiatrists before finding one who gave him the best advice (‘Bob,
sounds like you’re gay. Why don’t you try accepting it?’), Muslim-Australian
siblings challenging the western notion of ‘coming out’ (instead, invite your
loved ones into your life), and lawyers advocating for sex-positive aged care
facilities (why aren’t there any double beds?). In a bright spot for aged care,
Human Rights Commissioner Gillian Triggs pointed out that the recent change of
law for inclusive facilities was almost surprisingly uncontroversial; updating
the Sex Discrimination Act so religious aged care facilities were not exempt
from LGBTI non-discrimination was met with general acceptance across the
community.
Eleanor Kerdo:
On day 2 Eleanor
swapped in and attended the ageing and aged care stream. There are lots of
organisations working on making aged care facilities (ACF) and services more LGBTI inclusive, both at a
policy and personal level. Silver Rainbow is offering training on inclusive
practice to ACF staff, while the Department of Social Services is developing
formal standards for LGBTI inclusive aged care. Palliative Care Australia is similarly
working on LGBTI specific policy frameworks. On a frontline service level,
Switchboard Victoria provides community connections to isolated LGBTI elders
through the good old cup of tea, connecting them to new friends who can build
their confidence and support them settling into aged care.
Philomena Horsley of Gay
and Lesbian Health Victoria (LaTrobe University) presented on LGBTI people’s
experiences in end of life care and reflected on the history of end of life
care in the LGBTI community. At the height of the 1980s HIV-AIDS epidemic, the
LGBTI community was at the centre of an underground end of life care and
euthanasia movement to support terminally ill patients with AIDS. At that time
a large number of nurses and doctors could see a clear need for those services
and took big personal risks to provide care. As conversations about dying with
dignity become prevalent again it is timely to reflect on those moments in
history that were so compelling to past generations.
Several community
groups expressed an interest in HCCA’s Advance Care Planning Project, and
Christine is looking forward to working with LGBTI communities in Canberra to
help people develop aged care plans that work for them.
Thanks for sending us to this conference we thought it was excellent!